However you’re definitely not the only one who feels this way. I certainly don’t think that everyone is dumber than I am, in fact very much the opposite. HTML5 is being developed as the next major revision of HTML (Hypertext Markup Language), the core markup language of the World Wide Web [1,2]. A deluge of new inputtypes have been introduced. The rules that I describe here apply to those elements as well. This means that by default, you can still (modulo bugs) parse MediaWiki pages using XML libraries, transform them via XSLT, etc. If not, it’s probably not a (an , perhaps). … In the “real world” of business, you’re going to have a boss who isn’t going to care how “semantically correct” a web application interface page is, as long as it works. HTML5 is awesome & these mistakes occur many times unintentionally.. What a brilliant article. main {} ? Lolz, answered my own question: http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/syntax.html#start-tags, Mmm, I should have read the side bar… Inconvenience of not having a preview facility… You make many valid points and I’m not saying anything is wrong, but people put too many “semantics” into HTML code. Or should you use both? I do it to help users of assistive technology easily find important navigation, eg site-wide stuff. Text surrounded by tags is displayed with a bold typeface. @fjpoblam — the rendering bug you see will be addressed when we move to a liquid layout. Tables should not be used as a convenient way to make columns and headers at the level of a whole document. What we did, is we made a “html5 mode” toggle button, which replaces the embed code with video tag code upon user request. The whole point (I thought) was to show that you can usually best use without wrapping it in a element … but in the final example, you neglect to use the attribute at all! Richard is Head of Interactive at KMP Digitata, a digital agency based in Manchester, UK. "If a document language provides markup features to control bidi, authors and users should use those features instead and not specify CSS rules to override them." A number of fields will utilize the appropriate field types based on the information they’re collecting. While HTML, prior to HTML5, was defined as an application of Standard Generalized Markup Language (SGML), a flexible markup language framework, XHTML is … When an HTML document includes special characters outside the range of seven-bit ASCII, two goals are worth considering: the information's integrity, and universal browser display. It ultimately boils down to personal preferences and what you feel comfortable designing into your markup. All that means is there will be a complete lack of structure in the end. color: red; For example, including any of the elements listed in Non-conforming features within a document increases the risk of that document not being polyglot markup. ), required If it’s a descendant of an article or a section it’s primary navigation for that context. Don’t use section as a … There’s no sense writing markup when you don’t have to, right? You’re right re ‘syntax’ added that in now! Fiddling with structures is not very future-proof, so it’s best to keep to certain best practices. I’m currently working on a few html5 sites and this was a very enlightening read for me. @Joel – It depends on what type of pagination I guess. Compatibility mappings indicate a Specifically, it says “an h1-h6 element”. This was a joke, right? This mistake is similar. Thanks for the article. If you’re looking for a page wrapper element (for any flavour of HTML or XHTML), consider applying styles directly to the element as described by Kroc Camen. This is great, and for example the spec will probably be changed based on the problem our non-conforming usage uncovered. The reason, why I think it is a mistake, has the following reasons. However, as you can see Bruce see’s it from a different angle. Thank you, I will try to change, I think you might be missing a key point at the end of your section called “Your logo is not a figure” when you finally sum up by saying, “All you need is this:”…. Thanks Steve, But how to styling role=”main” ? We’ve got the same setup and it’s ok for us. Both have different qualities. using ARIA), doing so is significantly more difficult than doing so when using semantically-appropriate markup. http://www.accessibleculture.org/articles/2011/10/jaws-ie-and-headings-in-html5/. [role=main] { In particular, it is common for footers to have a short list of links to various pages of a site, such as the terms of service, the home page, and a copyright page. If you’re using the new sectioning elements, I can give you this markup: and you can copy it and paste it anywhere in your page without modification. I trust the content there will be more to your liking ;). Thinking semantically (and intuitively I would argue), I would wonder why, when looking at a page with several lists of links, that some merit a tag and some don’t. When used in HTML documents, the allowed content model is as follows: In a head element, if scripting is disabled for the noscript element. Below is a sample form which is perfect for study purposes. The only browser that ever needed it, Netscape (4 and earlier), is long gone. HTML5]] Polyglot markup should not use any elements excluded from HTML, XHTML, or both. In this post you’ll learn how to use these sectioning elements in your own web sites. @Brajeshwar: Agreed, and I do – but if you’re doing a fallback validation, or even just want to get all the required inputs, a $('input[required]') (to use a jquery example) with . Lol! The second option can only be used in XHTML5 served as “application/xhtml+xml”. However, HTML5 is so new that not all browsers have caught up to it yet, and people who use older computers may not have the latest version of a browser even if an HTML5 compatible version is available. HTML5 is not yet an official standard, and no browsers have full HTML5 support yet. @Christian – I’ve fixed a few typo’s, are there any I’ve not got? In effect, this is the in-document declaration. A high percentage of our readers pick up errors in our articles and bugs in our code which is invaluable for a resource such as HTML5 Doctor. Thanks to all for your feedback, some specific responses below: @gnur – you’re right you don’t need the trailing slash but can include it if you prefer to write your markup using XHTML syntax. @Joe, thanks for the reminder, I’ve included a note about hgroup. I like some of the functionality that HTML5 introduced (e.g. The hgroup hokey cokey. In fact, several scripting languages can be used within a single .asp file. The short answer is that the most robust method is to use both at the same time, in the same element. the discussion above. These questions are also included in the HTML5 element flowchart mentioned earlier. @Ric — I’ve been thinking about and for attribution, but there’s one potential problem, the “moved away from that primary content” part. Case-sensitivity. All you need is this: Another common misconception regarding is that it can only be used for images. MediaWiki currently still outputs well-formed XML by default. HTML5 doesn't require XML well-formedness – e.g., you can omit attribute quote marks – but it does permit it. In XHTML or HTML4, I would see something like this: Frankly, that’s just wrong: is not a wrapper. I must have been thinking of element if there’s only a single
